Well written. I’m glad to hear other people talk about the importance of correctly using vocabulary. Especially when it comes to delineating the line between law abiding citizens and criminals. I do not abide in my agency or life any slang terms or euphemisms when it comes to things that I would lay my life down for. Thank you for continuing to defend truth, sir!
I would say number one. DTF doesn't care about the forest and are just camouflage for Antifa. Even the established environmental groups are only describing DEI issues and how marginalized communities will be disproportionately impacted. This is going to be a continuing story for years.
Well written. I’m glad to hear other people talk about the importance of correctly using vocabulary. Especially when it comes to delineating the line between law abiding citizens and criminals. I do not abide in my agency or life any slang terms or euphemisms when it comes to things that I would lay my life down for. Thank you for continuing to defend truth, sir!
Thank you for writing this. I have been following this story since the OIS with the eco-terrorist a few weeks/months ago.
Tho, not being local - I have a difficult time wondering why it is so opposed?
Is it?
1) The anti-police activists who want to abolish police and oppose everything police do.
2) Actual environmentalists.
3) fiscal conservatives.
- The obvious hypocrisy is: they claim to want better police - yet literally set fire to a state of the art police training facility.
I would say number one. DTF doesn't care about the forest and are just camouflage for Antifa. Even the established environmental groups are only describing DEI issues and how marginalized communities will be disproportionately impacted. This is going to be a continuing story for years.